Longing for His Family Back

February 22nd, 2011 by Randy Hicks
Share |

Billy Ray Cyrus is famous in his own right, sort of. In the 1990’s he became a star for a song that was better known for its title, Achy Breaky Heart, than its melody. But in recent years he’s become better known for being the father of Miley Cyrus, the much adored but increasingly scorned star of the Disney television show Hannah Montana.

Today, he’s a broken man. He said as much – multiple times – in a recent rambling and monologic interview with GQ Magazine. And, frankly, anyone reading the article with an ounce or two of humanity in them is likely to feel some pangs of sympathy for a man who longs, above all else, to have his family back and intact.

At times the Cyrus interview reads almost like a confession, a lengthy admission of his failures and regrets. At other times it reminds me (though I’m sure many others won’t see it this way) of the biblical laments of King David – expressions of shame and pain out of which a clarity about life and priorities emerges.

Now, please don’t send me letters pointing out the immense chasm that exists between the author of the 23rd Psalm and the author of trite 1990’s country balladry. I get it. My point is that the vast expanse of history reveals a human propensity to learn lessons through failure, some of which is far more painful and costly than others. And in this case, Cyrus seems to be teetering on the edge of profound despair over some fateful decisions he made years ago, even as his moral vision grows clearer.

He regrets choosing to be Miley’s friend instead of being her father. And he regrets ceding power to Miley’s handlers, who appear much more interested in the teen star’s ability to make them all rich than they are in her wellbeing and character.

But the greatest regret seems to be the decision he made years ago to do the show in the first place. After declaring that the show “destroyed my family,” he answers a question about whether or not he regrets doing Hannah Montana in the first place:

“I hate to say it, but yes, I do. Yeah. I’d take it back in a second. For my family to be here [at his home in Tennessee rather than Los Angeles] and just be everybody okay, safe and sound and happy and normal, would have been fantastic. Heck, yeah. I’d erase it all in a second if I could.”

You can’t help but feel for the guy. He’s caught between what could have been and what is.

Now, largely because of what I do as a commentator on the family, I’ve grown accustomed to mining for lessons in stories like these. Because we humans are so much more alike than we are different, I can always discover hints of myself – and of others – in people’s adventures and foibles.

One might scoff and say, “A lesson for me in the Billy Ray and Miley train wreck? Well, yeah…If I ever happen to have a child earning millions in the entertainment industry.”

But the Cyrus family morality play – being lived out in front of a gawking public – has many of the same themes running through it as do the lives of most families. The difference is one of scale, not substance.

Most of us wrestle, perhaps subconsciously at least, with questions about how to parent our children well. And many succumb to the temptation to be a friend to our children (a role that can be filled by hundreds) instead of being who we should be – the parent.

We wrestle with priorities, often finding ourselves enticed by things that seem good – popularity and achievement, to name a couple – that can actually destroy us if they are not grounded in values and strong family relationships.

In the end, this heartbreaking story simply reminds me that my first order of business as a father and husband is not to drive my family and kids toward material riches, but to guide them toward genuine relational wellbeing. After all, right about now, Billy Ray Cyrus would trade all that apparent success for a healthy and happy family life in suburban Nashville.

Mentors, not Buddies

February 18th, 2011 by April Watson
Share |

I have spent the last few minutes glancing over a horribly tragic article on GQ’s website. The article is the recounting of an interview—more of a rambling conversation, really—with Billy Ray Cyrus, the early 90’s country music star and father of the seemingly off-the-rails teen star Miley Cyrus.

In his conversation with the GQ reporter, Cyrus admits to loneliness and shame—because of his upcoming divorce, because of the scandalous and well-publicized mistakes his daughter has made, and because he feels he has been played as a fool by Miley’s “handlers.” All of this is mixed in with conversation about his upcoming album, stories about his childhood and even discussions of his hairstyle. But the soul-baring nature of his fatherly confessions is heartbreaking. One particular quote stood out to me as significant:

[Cyrus] tells me that he has never been able to discipline his kids and that he now wonders whether that was a mistake. “How many interviews did I give and say, ‘You know what’s important between me and Miley is I try to be a friend to my kids’? I said it a lot. And sometimes I would even read other parents might say, ‘You don’t need to be a friend, you need to be a parent.’ Well, I’m the first guy to say to them right now: You were right. I should have been a better parent. I should have said, ‘Enough is enough—it’s getting dangerous and somebody’s going to get hurt.’ I should have, but I didn’t. Honestly, I didn’t know the ball was out of bounds until it was way up in the stands somewhere.”

It’s amazing the pull our children’s happiness has on our hearts. Each time my toddler wants something, there is something in me that wants to give it to him, regardless of the consequences (thankfully at this point it’s only a spoiled dinner or a big mess I’ll need to clean up later). But the simple fact is our role as parents is not to cater to our children’s happiness. It is to teach them the virtue and character that will enable them to live rich, full and, yes, even happy lives when they take the reins.

Miley was recently voted “the worst celebrity role model for young girls” for the second year in a row—and this was in a poll that was voted on by teenage girls themselves. It is devastating to read a parent lament the time and opportunity he has lost, but even now Cyrus seems to think there is nothing he can do to make a difference in Miley’s errant ways. I would venture to say that for a young girl labeled as a terrible role model, a good strong father to look up to is exactly what could set her straight.

There is hope for Miley and for our kids, too. According to a Barna Research poll released just two weeks ago, teens choose family members as primary role models, even when the possible answers did not include parents. This means that hopefully our children will choose to look to wise adults in their families instead of wrong-headed celebs like Miley. It also means that Billy Ray could be just what his daughter is looking for. I hope that he will step up and pursue the role that is rightfully his in Miley’s life, for both of their sakes.

What is the message and motivation behind MTV’s new show ‘Skins’?

January 28th, 2011 by Randy Hicks
Share |

Apparently the powers that be at MTV don’t get out much. Or maybe they get out, but don’t read much. Or perhaps they watch too many of their own reality shows. Because if they had taken any time to look into what’s going on with our youth, and what benefits or harms them, they would have rejected the very idea of their controversial new show called “Skins.”

As you might have noticed, the new program has been getting a lot of attention. So what’s it about? MTV’s description says, “Be it sex, drugs, the breadth of friendships or the depth of heartbreaks, Skins is an emotional mosh-pit that slams through the insanity of teenage years.” I’ll say. The show has lots of sex, lots of drugs, lots of drinking, lots of dysfunction and lots of dialogue about all of the above.

Everyone agrees that “Skins” is pushing new limits for television. All of the lead actors who are portrayed smoking, drinking, doing drugs and engaging in sex are teenagers themselves ranging in age from 15 to 19.

Concern about the show’s inappropriate content arose several weeks ago, but the controversy really exploded when the New York Times reported that MTV executives were concerned that some scenes could actually violate federal child pornography laws. It appears the only thing that would give MTV pause about the show’s content is the possibility of legal trouble. Now there’s a standard! Forget the message it sends, the behavior it encourages, or (heaven forbid) the morality or ethics of the entire thing.

Sadly, we cannot expect responsible consideration of such things from MTV. Despite the network’s claim that the show is meant for adults, we can be certain it’s being watched by throngs of young people. After all, it’s a show about teenagers starring teenagers. “Skins” has been promoted on teen websites and can be watched online at any time. Who do they think will be watching?

Defenders of the drug-filled, sex crazed show have tried to ascribe it more noble motives. “‘Skins’ is a show that addresses real-world issues confronting teens in a frank way,” said an MTV spokesperson. One TV columnist asserted “we should recognize that it stirs debate and reflects many teenagers’ reality.”

Oh please, are we to believe the show’s creators are out to do us a favor by portraying “realistic” teenage life? If so, then what’s the message and motivation behind the show?

Let’s not kid ourselves. MTV is airing an explicit, provocative show to get a lot of viewers and to make money. They really don’t care about the impact of glamorizing destructive teenage behavior. And they certainly aren’t going out of their way to tell teens to avoid acting this way. In fact, this show will have the opposite effect.

If the show is suppose to start a conversation, let’s talk about how teenagers who watch programs with lots of sex are more likely to start having sex themselves at a younger age. And let’s talk about why unbridled sex can be physically and emotionally harmful to teenagers. Sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancy, abortion and the emotional toll from broken relationships (especially on girls) can have lifelong consequences. Can we talk about that?

Let’s talk about how underage drinking and drug use can impair judgment, lead to addiction and even death. Can we talk about that?

By regularly exposing kids to this stuff, we risk normalizing self destructive behavior. Young viewers can be left with the perception that this is the way teens are – and the way they should be too. It appears MTV wants them to believe that. But what about the teenagers who don’t live that way, or won’t benefit in any way by being told this is how things are. It only increases the pressure they feel.

Perhaps MTV could produce a show that portrays teenagers who are successfully fighting to remain true to their commitments to avoid risky and damaging behaviors like premarital sex and drug use.

At this point, and in MTV’s world, wouldn’t these types of kids be the true rebels?

Bad Apple

January 21st, 2011 by Randy Hicks
Share |

Consumer electronics giant Apple is known for its technological innovation and creativity. The company has sold millions of iPhones, iPads and computers over the years and just reported $6 billion in profits for the last quarter.

When it comes to products for the tech market, they’re getting a lot of things right. However, their recent action has proven that they don’t always get it right.

A few months ago, Apple decided to remove an app from their online store that was created for the Manhattan Declaration – a statement of Christian conscience that espouses Biblical principles related to marriage, human life and religious freedom. It’s a statement of belief that has been signed by nearly 500,000 Christians.

Though the app had been approved and posted by Apple, they later removed it after getting pressure from homosexual activists saying it was “likely to expose a group to harm” and considered to be “objectionable and potentially harmful to others.”

So what does the Manhattan Declaration say? Here’s how the preamble begins: “Christians are heirs of a 2,000-year tradition of proclaiming God’s word, seeking justice in our societies, resisting tyranny, and reaching out with compassion to the poor, oppressed and suffering.”

Frightening isn’t it.

The Declaration goes on to explain its three central tenets addressing the sanctity of human life, the value of marriage, and freedom of religion and conscience. It thoughtfully expresses what millions of Christians believe is true about the condition of man and the church’s responsibility to address the critical issues of our time – just as the church has done for centuries.

I don’t expect everyone to agree with what the Declaration says, but you’d have to do violence to logic to determine that this is a hostile document.

Apparently some folks haven’t figured out that disagreement does not always mean hostility. All of us have disagreed with someone we know, but we don’t automatically assume the difference is motivated by ill will. In this case, Apple is going along with a small group of politically motivated activists who disagree with the document and wrongly mischaracterize its intent.

Without question there have been incendiary and irresponsible statements made by Christians and those claiming to be. Perhaps most notable are the members of the Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church who picket soldiers’ funerals claiming God has killed them because of America’s tolerance of homosexuality. Their statements are hateful and cruel, not to mention theologically wrong. Theirs is an offensive message that should be rejected.

The Manhattan Declaration, however, is not.

Its tenets are expressed in a respectful tone that reaffirms each Christian’s responsibility to his fellow man, including loving your neighbor as yourself. The document is simply a clear statement of beliefs that have been held by Orthodox, Catholic and Evangelical Christians for centuries. To claim that this content is potentially harmful and objectionable is to claim that historic, foundational beliefs held by Christians are themselves harmful and objectionable. Let’s hope that is not the position Apple is taking.

Apple has every right to reject any app it wants. Last year, it weathered criticism for its wise decision to reject pornography-related apps. In this case, however, the company is showing itself to be obtuse and out-of-step with mainstream religious beliefs, while refusing to allow free and open debate about those beliefs. To quote one of the Declaration’s drafters Chuck Colson, “it was a triumph of political correctness and ad hominem attack over civil discourse.”

What Apple has chosen to do is far more egregious than anything the Manhattan Declaration comes close to doing – by a long shot. I’m hopeful they change their mind because if this type of content is rejected, there’s no telling what might be next.

Don’t Be That Parent

December 21st, 2010 by Stephen Daniels
Share |

A recent Sunday edition of the New York Times Magazine published a disturbing front-page story titled “As Bullies Go Digital, Parents Play Catch-Up.”

Every parent should read it.

The article is an eye-opening look at shocking cyberbullying that takes place among young people today. It recounts numerous stories of kids’ mistreatment at the hands of classmates and the complex dynamic parents must navigate to resolve the problem.

Author Jan Hoffman writes: “It is difficult enough to support one’s child through a siege of schoolyard bullying. But the lawlessness of the Internet, its potential for casual, breathtaking cruelty, and its capacity to cloak a bully’s identity all present slippery new challenges to this transitional generation of analog parents.”

Are you an analog parent?

Sadly, many parents are at an instant disadvantage to protect their kids from these menacing attacks because they are not actively engaged in their child’s online world.

We can’t shield our kids from everything, but we can help prevent heartache and harm by keeping a close watch on what they say and do online.

One thing is certain, for their sake we cannot be outmoded spectators.

Making the Holiday Fun and Meaningful

December 17th, 2010 by Randy Hicks
Share |

What do you want for your children this holiday season? Gifts? OK. Family time? Sure. Travel to Grandma’s house, decorating house and tree? All sound like great ideas that evoke fond memories in most of us. And I hope my kids and I can enjoy many of them together.

But I want to remember to impart something more to my children through the holidays. And, if I do it right, they won’t even know I’m instructing them. And, quite frankly, I need the reminder myself.

One thing we can learn together is the value of giving. Personally, as someone raised in a family that celebrates Christmas, I regret the current cultural view of the Christmas season as simply an excuse to shop uncontrollably. It’s clear that the most holy day of the year in one of the world’s largest faiths long ago morphed into a massive marketing opportunity for J. Crew, Target and Kay Jewelers.

Here’s one idea for demonstrating a spirit of giving at Christmas to help your kids see the value in focusing on others, not just on their wants. Within the next few weeks you might want to have your kids go through their toys and pull out those things that they just don’t use anymore, and prepare to give the items in good condition to someone in need.

Many kids don’t have any toys at all, much less new ones every year. Tell them the story of St. Nicholas – the inspiration for Santa Clause was all about giving to the needy. By giving some of their toys away, your children can experience some of the joy embodied in the story of St. Nicholas. I’d encourage you not to just teach your kids to give away things they don’t want, but out of their abundance.

When your family meets another’s need, it’s a great opportunity to help them understand how much they have to be grateful for. I think gratefulness is a trait that is in short supply in most of our lives. We are so busy comparing ourselves and our possessions with others, not only in our cul de sac, but also the perfect families with the perfect things we see on TV.

We have forgotten how truly blessed we are. Perhaps at Christmas we should practice a new kind of comparing – comparing ourselves with those who are less fortunate and being grateful for all we have. Cultivating an attitude of gratefulness is a life-long gift you can give to your kids, and a great antidote to whining and selfishness.

Another gift that can help define your family is that of meaningful traditions. If you’re like me, some of your fondest memories of the holidays revolve around traditions practiced by your family. It might be the tattered stocking you always hung on Christmas Eve, or watching Miracle on 34th Street while enjoying mom’s once-a-year chocolate cookies.

I love the atmosphere of excitement, anticipation and wonder that surrounds the holidays. And years from now, I want my kids to look back on their growing up years with the same kinds of warm memories I have. Traditions and celebrations enrich our lives and give our children and our families a sense of identity. If this was not a part of your upbringing, you might have to learn how to celebrate.

Start with watching your favorite Christmas movies together, both old and new: Miracle on 34th Street and the Santa Clause movies with Tim Allen, White Christmas and How the Grinch Stole Christmas (the cartoon is much better than the more recent studio version). Go Christmas caroling, trim the tree to the sounds of your best seasonal music and make all sorts of ridiculous sweets that provide the reason for New Year’s resolutions.

What do you want for your kids and for yourself this holiday season? For me, I need to seek a spirit of giving, cultivate an attitude of gratefulness, and celebrate the traditions – new or old – that have the power to bind families together across generations.

HOPE – Marriage is full of it!

December 8th, 2010 by John Jauregui
Share |

Here’s a question for our married readers: When you were first married to that wonderful, exciting, fascinating person known as your spouse, do you remember what you were hoping for? Perhaps you were anticipating a lifetime of romantic bliss, or maybe a house full of perfect children. Perhaps yours was a vision of uninterrupted togetherness or a lifestyle driven by your next door neighbors – the Jones!

How has all of that worked out for you?

For many of us who have experienced the highs, lows and average levels of marital relationships, hope may be the one word that best describes our expectations for the future. Hope for a marriage that is better tomorrow than it was yesterday, or hope that the lessons learned from previous adventures will be invested in a more caring style of communication. Hope for a more intimate partnership with the one who occupies that other side of the bed, or maybe hope that your children will model a healthy marriage to your grandkids.

So what is your hope based on? Is it founded on some whimsical notion about “happily ever after,” or a thought that if the marriage does not work out then there is always someone else “out there?”

But perhaps your hope is based on you and your spouse’s commitment to your marriage relationship and to each other. Maybe yours is a hope that is steeped in a persistence that your marriage will not fail because you won’t let it fail. If so, your future together is likely bright.

What is the hope for your marriage? And more importantly, what are you going to do about it?

Recent reports don’t square with Americans’ feelings about marriage

December 3rd, 2010 by Randy Hicks
Share |

Virtually every major news outlet in the country shouted it and every talk show discussed it: “Marriage is becoming obsolete.”

The interest in the apparent obsolescence of marriage came from a highly publicized survey of Americans conducted by the Pew Research Center titled, “The Decline of Marriage and the rise of New Families.”

If you care about the state of marriage and family in America, the title sounds quite ominous. And it is. But if there was ever a time to actually heed the bromide, “there’s more to it than meets the eye,” this is it.

The Pew report does contain some genuinely bad news, including the fact that the marriage rate continues to decline, as does the rate of children living with their married parents. And the fact that cohabitation and unwed childbearing rates continue to climb can only be viewed as a negative thing as well. Why? Because according to academic studies far too numerous to name, kids and adults in single parent homes are at a much higher risk for a wide variety of social harms.

And the fact that, according to the Pew report, 39 percent of adults agree that “marriage is becoming obsolete” is troubling indeed. But that response was in reply to a question about marriage as a social concept; but as you dig deeper into the report, it is clearly a statement about what the respondents perceive to be true about what’s going on in the culture more broadly, not about their own personal feelings about marriage.

So let’s begin that deeper dig and look at some of the other numbers. As we do, you’ll discover that American adults value marriage greatly; they’re just not so sure if others around them feel as strongly about marriage as they do.

  • Only 13 percent express no interest in marrying.
  • Only 16 percent of those currently living together without the benefit of marriage express no interest in marriage. In other words, those we’d assume to be less keen on the idea of marriage are actually interested in marrying.
  • More people want to marry today than did in 2007.

What might be the most encouraging piece of information from the report is that fact that, “The youngest generation has the strongest desire to marry.” Seven out of ten unmarried 18 to 29-year-olds say they want to be married.

So, what do we make of all this? Well, I’d sum it up this way: generally speaking, people like marriage and want to be married. They just don’t think you and I do. And who can blame anyone for reaching that conclusion? With marriage rates declining and cohabiting increasing, it would be easy for any one of us to conclude that “marriage isn’t as relevant to others as it is to me.”

But the Pew report reveals an enduring individual desire to marry and have healthy relationships. So I suspect the real problem here is a lack of confidence – a lack of confidence in others’ ability to form and sustain a healthy marriage and a lack of confidence in one’s own ability have a long-lasting marriage. In context, it appears that the continuing increase in rates of cohabitation is a reflection of people’s lack of confidence (not their lack of interest) in marriage.

A generation ago, “living together” or “shacking up” was much more of an expression of social defiance – an in-your-face rejection of the social mores of the previous generation. But given the fact that, according to the Pew report, 64 percent of cohabiters see their cohabiting as “a step toward marriage,” living together today seems to reveal an internal confliction of hope and fear.

Is too much being made of the Pew report findings on marriage becoming obsolete? Well, yes and no.

The fact is, marriage in America is in a fragile state and many have become disillusioned about whether lasting marriage is actually possible. Divorce is common and numerous children are growing up in homes without a father. Family fragmentation often begets family fragmentation. Rampant cohabitation does not bode well for healthy marriages either as research has shown that living together before marriages actually increases the chances of divorce for many couples.

However, most of us desire marriage and for life-long love to succeed. The challenge is helping couples to believe it’s possible – more possible than the culture makes us believe. The question is: are we doing what it takes to help people have a successful marriage?

Putting Electronics to Bed

November 23rd, 2010 by Stephen Daniels
Share |

Once our kids are in bed, do they go to sleep?

If they have access to a cell phone, computer or video games, chances are they might not be sleeping as much as we think.

New research has found some startling evidence that using electronic media after bedtime is common among many children and teens. In fact, the JFK Medical Center just surveyed 40 students and found they sent an average of 33.5 text messages or emails per school night anywhere from 10 minutes to 4 hours after bedtime.

The older kids get the more time they spend awake with technology. Boys tend to surf the internet or play video games, and girls are more likely make calls or text.

Poor sleep caused by nighttime electronics use can affect a young person’s mood, behavior and ability to learn among other things.

Researchers have found that electronic media are more stimulating than watching television because of the rapid interaction – texters anticipating a response, gamers wanting to play again to improve their score, etc.

Helping our kids get a good night’s sleep is important. That means managing their use of technology so that they aren’t tempted to stay up late.

So what should parents do?

Bedtime should be an electronics-free time.

Restrict any use of technology after bed. This could mean having a place outside their bedroom to store their phone and video games overnight. If they have a computer in their room, consider removing it, or at least insisting that it be turned off at night.

Physicians even recommend turning off electronics an hour or two before bed so that kids can settle into sleep better.

Set a curfew for your kid’s technology. It will benefit them, and you may even find a more pleasant child living under your roof.

What Halloween Reminds Us About Protecting Our Daughters

October 29th, 2010 by Randy Hicks
Share |

As we creep closer to Halloween I’m struck by the way costume companies have brought new meaning to the word “trick” in trick or treat.

Millions of children will be dressed up as their favorite characters from books or television shows. Others will dress like the traditional ghost, witch or other scary character. But a troubling number of adolescent and teenage girl are choosing costumes that are more suitable for a strip club than the front porch of your home.

One needs only to scan through the party store sale flyers in the newspaper to see just how girls’ costumes have degenerated. There’s the “racy referee” with the high heels and miniskirt, and the “blood lust vampire” with the black laced bustier and fish net leggings. Even the Alice in Wonderland costume shows little resemblance to the classic Disney character. I don’t recall Alice ever wearing short skirts, striped glovettes and leggings.

Grown women dress like this to be sexually attractive to men. Since when did it become OK for girls who can’t even drive to wear costumes that imitate strippers and street walkers? My friend, author and speaker Rebecca Hagelin, raises a good question: who are these girls trying to entice? “14-year-old boys carrying bags of candy? 35-year-old dads who answer the door? The pedophile down the street?” Chances are the girls aren’t trying to entice anyone. The makers of the costumes on the other hand…what are they thinking?

These costumes, and many of the clothes marketed to young girls today, turn them into sexual objects – overemphasizing body image and misleading girls into believing that being sexy and attractive are what give them self-worth.

I’m sure someone reading this is thinking to themselves “Come on, this is all in fun. Let these kids have a good time, let them use their imagination.” Well, for starters, we should be concerned about what may go on in other people’s imaginations when they see girls dressed like this. But aside from that, there’s clear evidence that this is damaging to kids.

A report by the American Psychological Association linked what it calls the “sexualization” of girls to three of the most common female mental health problems: eating disorders, low self-esteem, and depression. They also linked it to many other physical and sexual consequences as well.

But retailers will continue peddling racy costume to our girls; just as many television programs, movies and recording artists will promote their own sexually charged messages. It’s a challenge for parents, but one worth taking on.

Parents need to be purposeful in teaching kids a healthy view of their sexuality, but more importantly of themselves. Our daughters (and sons) have intrinsic value because of who they are – their character, talents, intellect and personality. We should help them build their self-confidence and their self-respect by encouraging them to be engaged in sports, academics, church groups and other worthwhile things.

We need to protect them from the pressure to dress “sexy” and grown up. Halloween gives us the perfect opportunity to address the issue of modesty. Setting standards when our daughters are young (between 8 and 10 years old) is ideal. But even when they’re teenagers, it’s important to teach them that the way they dress sends a message. And their worth and value come from who they are, not how they look.

At the same time, we should be clear that there’s nothing wrong with wanting to look nice and be attractive. Changes in a girl’s body are natural and good. Her body is not the problem; it’s the clothes that are the issue. Instead of emphasizing what she can’t wear, we should help her find fashionable, but appropriate, alternatives.

What girls believe about themselves matters for their wellbeing, and the wellbeing of our sons too. If girls narrow their self-worth to how provocatively they dress, then they are missing the chance to appreciate everything else that makes them unique and special. We have to be sure they know there’s so much more to who they are.